A collection of essays, outdoor adventure stories, ruminations, wordplay, parental angst, and blatant omphaloskepsis, generated in all seasons and for many reasons at 64.8 degrees north latitude
Showing posts with label personality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label personality. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 4, 2014

The One Secret Trick...



Based on the ads that clutter the edges of my computer screen, I should be worried about a lot of things.  These include my wardrobe (“The latest in plus-size fashion!”), my finances (“Interest Rates Plummet!”), and my shoes (“Dozens of cute styles!”).  But there is one problem that the Internet Gods feel is even more appalling than my lack of trendy new pumps: the hideous signs of my decrepitude.

I should be stressing out about the dry skin on my feet, the wrinkles on my face, my maternal abdominal fat, and my general overall sagginess.  Scars are a biggie, too.  I should be trying to smooth them.  Erase them.  Photo-shop them.  Something.  Anything!  Indeed, I should be in a state of continual semi-panic about the visible effects of the Sands of Time. 

My proximal reaction is amusement at how poorly the digital universe seems to be tracking me. I’m not terribly prone to tinfoil-helmet-type fears; my thoughts are not valuable enough for anyone to want to steal them.  Still, it makes me snort and giggle to see just how wide of the mark these ads fly.   I’m pretty sure it doesn’t take an MBA to guess that a person who spends her time reading peer-reviewed journal articles, cracking obscure Star Trek jokes, and utilizing an online text-to-hexadecimal translator is probably not in the market for “The Revolutionary Secret That Dermatologists Hate!!!”

Come on, Google and Facebook, can’t you do any better than that? With all my keystrokes at your disposal, you still don’t know me one whit!

Or… do they? 

Oh, I don’t mean that I’m about to get liposuction and dermal abrasion, or start sighing abjectly in front of a mirror. (I can hear my friends snickering.)   Nonetheless, I do sometimes feel a disorienting disconnect with my sense of self.  Is that forty-two-year-old mom really… me? 

I clearly remember the summer day when I had recently reached the exalted age of ten, and my mother divulged that, deep down, she was still a ten-year-old, too.  The idea that my reliable, stolid mom-parent was simultaneously the pigtailed child grinning impishly from black-and-white post-WWII-Britain both comforted and terrified me.  Part of me wanted to cling to the childish idea that she – and all grownups – were omnipotent, omniscient beings who existed in a higher plane than my own.  But at the same time, I was already feeling the complex world of adulthood closing in on me like a pall of dense smoke.   I already knew that I didn’t ever want to lose my essential self. When it came time to navigate that daunting world, I wanted to still be me.  The me I knew. 

I am now the age that my mother was, on that particular day in 1982.

I don’t obsess over vanishing beauty; I never had it to lose, anyhow. At ten, I was not an adorable Shirley Temple; I was a grubby little nail-bitten creature often found somewhere high up in a tree.  At fourteen, I was not a peachy, blossoming young sylph; I was an uncomfortable collection of bony elbows, scraped knees, and miserable uncertainty.  At nineteen, I was not a gorgeously unblemished young lady with perfect curves; I was a doughy lump of acne skulking in a shapeless pair of overalls.  But through those horrifically awkward and sometimes terrifying years, I still believed that I could grow up to do world-changing things.  Cure cancer?  Visit Mars?  End war?  Discover new subatomic particles?  Heck, yes.  I adored logic puzzles, science fiction, running around in the woods, and asking way too many questions.  I liked inventing, and building.  I liked playing.  Playing!

And then Father Time wreaked a quarter-century of collateral damage. 

Facebook wants me to worry about the physical wear-and-tear and the visibly droopy bits, but what about the metaphorical scars and blemishes?  The wrinkling and graying of my perspective and personality?  The cumulative scarring of all of life’s failures and disappointments and disillusionments? Those seem far more difficult to treat with ointment, loofahs, supportive undergarments, or That One Secret Trick Your Doctor Won’t Tell You*. 

A few months back, a friend in his late thirties who is half-heartedly doggy-paddling around the dating pool expressed consternation about the fact that all the women he met had “emotional baggage.” 

My middle-aged cynicism kicked in instantly.  Baggage?  What, just like mine?  Just like yours?

Jay, who has been married to me for a full dozen years now, was about as unsympathetic as I was in the face of our friend’s complaint.  His thoughts on the matter, however, were radically different from mine.   While I inwardly harrumphed that all of us middle-aged farts carry a gray, wrinkly knapsack of past woes, Jay stoutly (and sweetly) maintained, “That’s silly.  Not all women have baggage.  Nancy doesn’t have any baggage at all.”  Yes.  He actually said that out loud.

Oh, Heavens to Betsy.  The assertion alone threw all the dirty laundry in my head into a fast spin cycle, churning up the staple set of humiliating and miserable memories that refuse to fade into obscurity.  I’m sure that hundreds of happy days have blurred together into a polyglot, but the most sparkling examples of my personal idiocy, embarrassment, and loss are as immovable and as obtrusive as pillars of polished marble. 

I should pause here to say that, given that I don’t have Baggage-with-a-capital-B, I have absolutely no ability (and no right whatsoever) to comment upon the agony of extraordinary emotional pain, loss, or paralysis, any more than I have the ability to imagine what it might be like to suffer physical paralysis. Nor do the Facebook ads that plague my screen offer cures for debilitating diseases, severe burns, or past abuse. They focus on the superficial effects of the passage of years: the everyday wear-and-tear and the inevitable scars, not the profound ones.  The ones we all acquire.  With time.

I worry that the impacts of all those small scars have cumulatively, yielded a crop of cynicism, inertia, and stolidness.  I peer in the metaphorical mirror, suspecting myself of giving up adventure for security and reneging on idealism and perfectionism in favor of Just Getting Shit Done.  Do I see just a hint of jadedness around my eyes?  Is my optimism sagging, thus allowing my sarcasm to flop around?  How did I get to be forty-two years old without ever paragliding, publishing a novel, or setting foot in Africa?  Why can’t I watch romantic movies without groaning and rolling my eyes, rather than sighing and tearing up?   At what point did the wrinkles of time inform me that my vote in the next Presidential election probably won’t matter, the Indigo Girls aren’t all that profound, and I’m never going to go to Mars?  My idealism is mottled with stretch-marks, dammit!

Stretch marks.  Yeah.  Okay, fine.  What about them?  The real, physical ones, that is.  Maybe there’s something I can learn from the physical that will inform the metaphysical.  So, okay, what of all the other physical changes and scars? 

I took stock of my scars.  And I found a few stories.

Left knee: don’t slide into first base if you are a second grader playing whiffle-ball in a parking lot. 

Right thigh: don’t go hiking up snowfields with an ice axe that you don’t know how to use. 

Left thigh: if invited by a family of Jamaican farmers to stop by any time before five o’clock, do not arrive five minutes late, after they have set loose their pack of trained German Shepherd guard dogs.  But if you do, pretending you came to play super-fun doggie games will fool five-and-a-half of the six. 

Lower abdomen: removing twelve pounds of tightly wedged twin by C-sections, by Jay’s report, involves a crowbar. 

Left breast: some lumps are benign.  Some days are full of gratitude. 

Arms: if you donate blood enough times – like maybe fifteen gallons or so by now – you’ll eventually have a collection of little needle-marks.  But they’re not junkie-marks, okay?  Okay? 

Face: for gods’ sake, stop picking at the acne!  Also, dusk in moose territory is a bad time to be driving relatively fast on a gravel road – but the doctor and two nurses in Meadow Lake Saskatchewan in the summer of ’99 were a kind, down-to-earth, and deeply generous team with a copious supply of heavy-duty black thread.

What does this all add up to, other than a complex roadmap of scar tissue (private tours -- by invitation only)?  Well, first of all, it shows that modern medicine is nothing to take for granted.  Second, it’s clear that I’ve gotten off pretty darned easily.  Third, it shows that scars tell a complicated story of good and bad luck, good and bad choices, and lessons fairly or unfairly learned.  But I think it offers a few broader hints, as well. 

One of those hints is – I kind of like my scars.  Mythologically speaking, those who try to turn back time do about as well as those who try to stop the tide or fly with wax wings.  But I don’t want to stop time, and more than I want to erase my scars.  My worries have less to do with my neck-veins, my unsightly calluses, and my too-too-solid thighs than with world-traveling still undone, world-saving still unaccomplished, and relative lack of parties at which everyone blasts the music immoderately high and starts taking clothes off – and these desires, I now realize, don’t have to be tied to anyone’s calendar but my own.

Yeah, I’m female, and yeah, I’m middle-aged.  As a result, the Advertising Gods think they have me pegged: “You Won’t Believe Our Miracle Scar-Erasing Crème!”

No, you’re right, I won’t believe. 

But there are things I do believe – and one of them is that I’ll happily ignore you, Facebook Advertiser.  I don’t want your snake-oil goo.  I don’t want your Dorian Gray outlook on life. I don’t want to erase my scars, expunge my past, return to high school, or reclaim all the fears, credulity, insecurities I’ve shed along the way. 

On the other hand, there are things I do want to hang onto.  My optimism is one of them. I want to believe that I can make a difference, that some songs are worth getting stuck in my head, and that sure, I will still travel the world one day with just a backpack on my back.  I want to stay up too late, and run around in the woods, and ask too many questions.  I want to eat s’mores with that once-me ten-year-old.

I’m pretty sure she’s here with me for good.  She’s a bit battered and scarred.  But… that’s okay.  She’s in for the long haul.




*Admittedly, my doctor does seem awfully youthful, but I’m pretty sure she’s not holding out on us.

Sunday, May 4, 2014

As Yoda as you wanna be








You are Spock.  Logical and sharp-witted, you are a natural for the role of Science Officer…

Oh, heck, yes.  Science Officer!  Logical!  Sharp-witted!  Of course I am.  I’m totally Spock… unless I take the online quiz again, choosing a different favorite shirt color.  In that case, I am... the starship captain?

You are Kirk. With a quick mind and a way with words, your decision-making abilities and persuasive personality are legendary. A worthy warrior and a convincing orator, you are just as likely to talk an adversary to death as to engage in physical combat.  Prone to long-winded bouts of rhetoric, you are nonetheless known to be a charmer.

What?  Long-winded bouts of rhetoric?  Um… like, say, seventy-one blog posts, all jam-packed with words, and all hewing closely to the well-honed topic of Whatever Nancy Happens to be Thinking About?

Oh.  Yeah, okay.  I guess I’m… a little Kirk-y… except for the charming part.  I’m pretty sure I’m severely lacking in that department, because I never, ever find curvaceous green women in my bed.*  But, regardless of my ways with the ladies – or lack thereof -- I definitely think of myself as more Spock-y.

But in the world of online quizzes, do my preferences really matte?  Once the results appear on the screen, the quiz has spoken -- and it has me pegged. (You are Yoda.)  It knows me. (You are Aragorn.)  It has completely figured out who I am. (You are Katniss.) It is providing me with a flattering mirror, a personal affirmation, a somewhat vague yet mostly complimentary box in which to put myself.  You are Spock.  That’s who I thought I was, and that’s who I am.  I’m validated.  Isn’t that why we take these quizzes in the first place?

A recent New Yorker article (Maria Konnikova, May 1 2014) posited as much, citing the well-known “Forer Effect” as a reason why these tests appeal to us, and why we believe what they tell us.

In 1948, psychologist Bertram Forer told his students that the typewritten sheets he was handing out were unique analyses of the personality of each member of the class, based on the questionnaire they’d filled out previously.

In reality, every “analysis” was exactly the same.

“You have a great need for other people to like and admire you... You have a great deal of unused capacity which you have not turned to your advantage… Disciplined and self-controlled outside, you tend to be worrisome and insecure inside… You pride yourself as an independent thinker and do not accept others' statements without satisfactory proof….”

The students, when asked to rate these results, were almost universally impressed by their accuracy.  Yes, that’s totally me!  I’m Spock, for sure!

So much for “independent thinker”.  So much for “satisfactory proof”.

The term “Forer Effect” was henceforth used to denote the now many-times-tested principle that people will overwhelmingly buy into the accuracy of vague personal assessments, provided that these assessments include lots of positive statements and are believed to be personally tailored to the individual.

Fortune-tellers and horoscope-writers wallow lucratively in the Forer effect – and did so long before it had a name.  Bolstered by the not-so-subtle cues of body language, dress, mannerisms, age, and gender, there’s a heck of a lot that Madame Zelda can tell you about tall dark strangers, personal aspirations, or the curvaceous green women you’re longing to find in your bed.

But are these online quizzes just a whole load of crystal-ball mumbo-jumbo?  What makes it SO DAMN TEMPTING to know whether I am a kick-ass teen-girl Defender of the Right named Katniss, or her sensitive, artistic, bread-baking boyfriend Peeta?  Why do I care whether an online algorithm says I’m Leia or Yoda, or (as promised by one peculiarly obscure quiz) Basil, Oregano, Marjoram, or Tarragon?  Why do I want to click?  IT’S NOT LOGICAL!

…Like Spock, you struggle with ethical dilemmas that seem at odds with your innate sense of reason…

Precisely.  It’s not logical.  In fact, the addictiveness of these quizzes is so illogical that they bring out all my most evil and sarcastic urges.  You’re going to tell me, in a Facebook post time-stamped at 1 a.m., that your “herbal archetype” is Basil, which indicates that “…you have a beautiful soul, and it shines through in the way you treat others?”  Alas, I am clearly not Basil myself, unless perhaps I’m Basil Fawlty.  My un-beautiful soul sniggers, and starts crafting new archetypes:

"You are bacon salt. Tacky and artificial, you tend to raise the blood pressure of anyone with whom you interact...."

"You are jeotgal. Like a long-fermented fish, your company is memorable -- but not at all in the way you'd like to be memorable..."

"You are chervil. Everyone sort of vaguely thinks they've heard of you, but no one knows what the hell to do with you, so they'll probably just go right on ignoring you..."

Of course, none of the “real” results are likely to tell you that you are an insufferable loser with all the personality and side-effects of a bucket of MSG. Can we possibly learn anything from these ultra-brief tests if all the results are benign and complimentary?  Does anyone take these quizzes and discover that they are Darth Vader, Cersei Lannister, and Cruella DeVille rolled into one tidy Hitler-flavored package?  Probably not, unless they are a thirteen-year-old hell-bent on rigging the results.

Still, I find myself wondering whether the quiz-player might (just might) be discovering something a little beyond what can be gained from a newspaper horoscope.  After all, even if the set of results is limited, this is not quite the same as Forer’s “something for everyone” uniform output.  In answering one of these questionnaires, and in agonizing over choice A or choice B, I am examining some of the traits that make a person the hero, the sidekick, the comic relief, or the villain.  I am, at least at some level, searching my psyche.

Am I Tyrion Lannister?  Please?  Really. I mean, I know that being a bitter, tragic, violent, whoring, drunken dwarf doesn’t sound all that great on paper, but I really want to be that bitingly funny, that stereotype-busting-tough, that sharply brilliant, that… Tyrion.  I want to know and affirm myself, yes, but I also want to mold myself, change myself, and reimagine myself.

The urge to discover ones archetype via the internet in the wee hours is not entirely logical, but I’m not convinced it’s merely the Forer Effect at work.  To me, accepting Forer’s results stems from our (very human and almost universal) tendencies to want to fit in, to feel that we are known and understood, to see ourselves in a relatively positive light, and to be obliviously self-centered.  Konnikova cites this rationale in the New Yorker, and I do agree that part of the appeal of “Which Star Trek Character Are You?” lies well within this realm.  However, the Forer Effect doesn’t really reflect intense curiosity, a trait that is also very human and almost universal -- but a lot more fun than complacent self-appreciation.  Nor does it reflect self-doubt, or the urge to live closer to a large yet untapped potential – two qualities so ubiquitous that they were happily accepted as individually true by almost every student in Forer’s psychology class.

Am I Tyrion Lannister?  And if not, how can I become him?  How can I find the right answers – and the right self – to be blaster-toting Empire-defying Princess Leia rather than pedantic, cowardly, pointy-headed, irritating (albeit weirdly loveable) C-3PO?   And if I’m not Basil, how can I be… more Basil?

…but you recognize the value of these internal struggles in growing as a person…

Exactly.  Sure, it might be more effective to try to examine and remake ourselves via years of psychotherapy, several 12-step programs, a Master’s Degree in engineering, a new exercise regimen, and a public-speaking course.  It might be logical to realize that eight or ten questions pertaining to your attitude on Away Missions, your response to warp-drive failures, and your preferred color of uniform shirt probably can’t help you find an inner self that is a dramatically more scientific or radically more likely to woo the aliens.  But most of us don’t have the time, money, or fortitude for the Full Archetypal Makeover.  We struggle along with the limited TV-referenced role-models we have at hand. That doesn’t mean that we aren’t trying.  It doesn’t mean that we aren’t hoping.  And it doesn’t mean that we can’t change.

The New Yorker article notes that people blatantly lie on online quizzes.  Well, maybe.  I mean, come on, I REALLY want to be Tyrion!  But if you are lying (to yourself) about (your own) emotional states and (your own) preferences, maybe it’s not so much dishonesty as, I don’t know, questing?  The psychological literature tells us – over and over again, on behalf of our kids and ourselves – that we become whom we imagine or believe ourselves to be.  Tell a child she’s stupid, irresponsible, and mean, and you might well end up with exactly the kid you prophesied.  Tell yourself you are brilliant, narcissistic, and psychopathically cruel, and you too can be Cersei. But learn to believe – really believe -- that you are brave in the face of tyranny, deeply wise (with enough humor to offset your gravitas), and surprisingly resourceful for a Muppet, and you might become just a bit more Yoda.

We take the quizzes.  We tell our friends -- tongue firmly in cheek and self-effacing-sarcasm meter cranked to “high” -- that we are Basil.  And then we try – honestly, if imperfectly -- to live up to our own leafy, herbal accolades.

“You have a beautiful soul, and it shines through in the way you treat others.” 

Yes.  Yes, it really does, my friend. 

…Your bouts of self-reflection have made you wiser.  May you live long and prosper.

See?  See?  I AM Spock.  I knew it all along.





*That is, not yet.  Anyone want to hold a Halloween party this year?