A collection of essays, outdoor adventure stories, ruminations, wordplay, parental angst, and blatant omphaloskepsis, generated in all seasons and for many reasons at 64.8 degrees north latitude
Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts

Thursday, November 10, 2022

Replenish the earth

Female dust mite, Wikipedia
 

There are mites in your eyebrows!

Every so often I run across a meme, an ad, or a click-baity headline that reminds me – dramatically, hyperbolically, photographically – that I live in a world that is utterly saturated in creepy-crawlies.  My couch is inhabited by hordes of pale, eyeless critters happily munching on my dead skin cells!  My countertops are reproductively active!  My water is wiggling!

I’m supposed to be horrified.  Instead, I find myself comforted.

I’m a biologist.  Most of the time, I work in the field of climate change adaptation research, but I also get a chance to teach.  As the professor for “Natural Resource Measurement and Inventory”. I torture students with data analysis, statistics, and experimental design.  Type one and type two error?  Correlations that mislead? Graphs that lie?  I like teaching that stuff; it brings out the scientific hardass in me.  But I love it when we get to take a step back.  Way back.  I love it when we get to look at the Earth as a great big ball of green, growing, oozing, pulsating, sticky, messy, many-legged life.

Having spent much of my adult life as one kind of environmentalist or another (after having spent much of my childhood rescuing ants and climbing trees), it’s easy to become depressed about just how much of Earth’s life we humans are destroying.  The numbers are staggering.  The losses are irreplaceable.  Measuring by sheer mass alone, we’ve already wiped out 85% of the planet’s wild mammals and birds, and replaced them with ourselves and our livestock. 

Eighty-five percent.

According to UN estimates, the human population of the earth will reach eight billion people this week – on November 15th, 2022, to be weirdly over-precise about it.  We’re an infestation.  In the face of this horror, I find it immensely relieving to know that at least we’re still vastly outweighed by insects. 

We’re even more out-hefted by bacteria and fungi, including our own microbiome.  The person in the mirror is a big sack of microbes; most of our own cells are not actually our own cells.  But those little beasts are cooperating with humans, a shady alliance, so perhaps they are not entirely to be trusted.

Plants outweigh us even more dramatically, but those guys – from lowly single-celled algae to towering redwoods – are the producers, not the consumers.  We’re not in their league; even if we humbly take a few steps down from the pinnacle of the food chain to enjoy a nice vegan stir-fry, we’re not going to be any good at photosynthesizing.  I take immeasurable solace in the green things, but it’s our hardy little competitors over here in the animal kingdom that offer a different and more perverse cheer whenever they remind me that we don’t really hold dominion over all the animals, regardless of whatever it is the bible says we are supposed to do with arks and whatnot.   

“Holding dominion” is clearly not in humans’ skillset.  We are, seriously, sooooo bad at it.  The insects will do a better job.

No one really knows how many insects, arachnids, and other crunchy-leggy little contenders there are in the world.  We don’t even have a clear sense of how many species there might be, let alone how many individuals.  But rough estimates suggest that for each human, there are about forty metric tonnes of arthropods. 

Forty tonnes. 

They’re in your couch.  They’re on your countertop.  They’re in your eyebrows!

Thank goodness.

 

Monday, October 12, 2015

Beware of the flower children




“We should build a giant electric fence,” my nine-year-old told me, “and put all the people inside it, and leave the rest of the world for all the other species.”  Then she folded her arms and glared at me.  For a 55-pound person, Lizzy has an intimidating glare.
This wasn’t the first Earth-First-style argument sprung upon me by my kids, and it wouldn’t prove to be the last, either.  Indeed, for a die-hard life-long environmentalist such as myself, it’s kind of ironic how often I’ve found myself trying to carve out a moderate position in my own household.  About a week prior to the above announcement, Lizzy declared that, “No one should be allowed to have any more children.” It was about then that I began to wonder, with some discomfort, what I might be doing wrong.
I do worry about conservation, of course.  A lot.  I mean, what do you expect, from a climate change researcher and former staffer for a greenie non-profit?  Heck, I was once a teaching assistant for an undergraduate course entitled, “Problems of Global Population Growth” But, regardless of what my reputation as a commune-dwelling Peace-Corps-veteran quarter-century-vegetarian may suggest, the annihilation of humanity really isn’t part of my game plan.  So why are my kids such nut-job zealots?
Lizzy’s twin, Molly, is less prone to baleful glares and extreme pronouncements than her sister is.  Nonetheless, her environmental fanaticism seems to be at least as well-developed, albeit with her own special empathetic twist.  She has been a vegetarian since she was six.  As far as I know, she has never strayed from the decision she made in first grade, no matter how many people ply her with crispy bacon or deep-fried bird-nuggets.  At first, I thought she was just doing it to please me; Molly is the kind of kid who likes to make Mommy happy.  But these days, her own notions seem a lot more well-formed and clearly articulated.  She is anxious about cow-farts contributing to the greenhouse effect.  She is horrified about the treatment of animals on factory-farms.  And, like Lizzy, she thinks there are too many people in the world, although she doesn’t seem to agree with the idea of caging or spaying them.  “Maybe it would be better if humans had never even evolved,” she told me sadly, one night at bedtime. 
Cripes.  I have a hard time handling this kind of nihilism from people who still sleep under Thomas the Tank Engine blankets amid a welter of cuddly bears, otters, bunnies, and owls.   What messages have I been offering to my fourth graders that would make them wish to annihilate their own species?  What have I screwed up?
Yes, it's a total parenting stereotype to blame myself, but I feel like I have cause for taking the mom-guilt on this one.  I am a professor of planetary doom.  Moreover, there’s often some kind of save-the-planet mini-lecture lurking behind many of our daily activities.  “Mommy, why do we have a wood pellet stove?”  Oooh, a chance to discuss carbon-neutral fuels from local sources!  I carefully flatten out every cardboard box and shove it away until the mass of recyclables threatens to overwhelm the cupboard door, at which point I finally get around to hauling it all off to the university recycling bins. It’s hard to find an opportunity, because I’m usually traveling by bike rather than car. “Mommy, how come we bike so much?”  Well, sweetie, that’s because your mother is psychotic…
If over-exposure to my sensibilities weren’t enough, the kids are also bombarded by grown-up conversations at the dinner table every night.  While many children dine with two adults, mine eat with nine – plus two older, savvier kids.  Between us, we have a ludicrous number of degrees, and an even more ludicrous number of loudly expressed opinions.  When we aren’t inadvertently over-educating the kids via risqué humor, we’re turning them into freaks in other ways.  Last week, when a local election was hanging in the balance, we ranted endlessly about various appalling candidates for Borough Mayor and Borough Assembly.  If there had been any appalling candidates for the at-large seats on the Interior Gas Utilities Board, we would have ranted about them, too.  We also went to town on the horrifying nature of Proposition 1, which aimed to reduce controls on air quality.  If your use of the word “freedom” includes exacerbating your neighbor’s asthma or endangering kids at a nearby school by burning tires as fuel, I do not think it means what you think it means.
The offshoot of all this was that at 10:20 p.m., when I had been anxiously hitting “refresh” on the election results webpage for an hour or so, I heard a plaintive cry from my insomniac kid.  “Mama?” 
I went in and gave Lizzy a kiss, and asked why she was awake.  She told me she was worried that we’d end up with terrible leaders and unhealthy air.  I assured her that the election outcome was promising to be better than expected. 
“Now I can go to sleep,” she sighed with relief.
I’m pretty sure no one else’s elementary school student lies awake contemplating the potentially dire ramifications of a mayoral candidate funded by the Koch brothers or a poorly worded anti-environmental referendum.
I might be proud of my daughters’ precocity as conservationists, if they weren’t taking everything to such ludicrous extremes.  “We’re ruining everything,” each of them has told me, more than once.  “We’re destroying the habitats of all the other species.”
Ah, habitats.  In addition to all the environmentalism that the twins wallow in at home, I’ve been sending them off to summer activities at Camp Habitat.  And Wild Rose.   And Calypso Farm and Ecology Center.  At these delightful camps, they get to be “earth children”, become friends with tadpoles, make mysterious objects our of mud, sing songs about habitats, and pretend that hiding in the tall grass will prevent me from insisting that they have to go home at the end of the day.  It all seems carefree, educational, and innocent.  I’m pretty sure that none of the sweetly smiling and infinitely energetic young counselors and teachers has been whispering to my pigtailed darlings, “Kill the humans!  KILL THE HUMANS!” 
And yet… there I was, having yet another preposterous bedtime conversation.  Why the passionate extremism from the freckle-nosed loose-toothed crowd?
“Humans use up everything, and they are just one species!” Lizzy declared, eyes blazing.  “It’s not FAIR!”
It’s not fair.  Lizzy says that a lot.  She says it about her half of the slice of pound cake, and her teacher’s propensity to not let anyone out for recess until the whole class has settled down, even though Lizzy is not one of the loud kids.  “It’s not fair!” reminded me of a larger truth that had been eluding me, within the radical environmental debate at hand: little people – and even not-so-little but still oh-so-young people – don’t merely feel passionate about habitats and ballot propositions.  They feel passionate about everything. 
Children are fervent about sock choices.  They seriously give a damn about who has the better flashlight, and who threw the first snowball at whom.  They have no filters and no sense of prioritization.  And, perhaps most importantly, they struggle with nuances, gray areas, and objective viewpoints.  If you tell a little kid that smoking is bad, she will stare in abject horror at the next person she sees lighting up outside a convenience store.  Mommy!  That man is BAD!
When I was between four and eight years old.  Jimmy Carter was in office.  In response to the energy crisis, he urged all Americans to conserve.  I can recall telling my parents, with great earnestness, that they needed to turn off the lights, because the President said so. I’m sure I was annoying as hell -- because, like all kids, I was kind of a nut-job zealot.
I like to imagine that by the time I reached my college years, my viewpoints had become more nuanced.  But I recall thinking that middle-aged people were boringly complacent.  I also recall doing a lot more marching and chanting than I’ve found myself doing in recent years.  Sign the petition!  Wear the T-shirt!  I have a couple of nostalgically confrontational twenty-plus-year-old T-shirts on my shelves that I don’t wear any more.  My current boring 43-year-old shifts in her seat uncomfortably. 
Okay, so my fourth graders want to eradicate humanity – or, at the very least, un-wish our differentiation from our great ape brethren -- so that the Lorax can flourish.  But maybe that’s normal.  Maybe it’s even positive.  They may be a little wacked, but only because their ideas are still so rough-hewn.  When the granite of their ideology weathers, the artistry of their environmental leanings will be, perhaps, more well-rounded, but still sturdy and stalwart: a worthy foundation.  And that might not be a bad outcome at all – if I do say so myself.
“I’m glad to be human,” I tell my kids as I tuck them in, and it’s the truth.  “I’m glad human beings evolved.  And I’m especially glad you two particular humans evolved.  I think you will do a pretty good job taking care of the planet.  I trust you with that.  I love you.  Good night.”  And I turn off the super-low-energy LED –cluster light.

Monday, February 24, 2014

Omnibus


“A developed country is not a place where the poor have cars, it’s where the rich ride public transportation.” – Enrique Peñalosa, former mayor of Bogotá


“When is your flight home?” my coworker asked, watching my feeble attempts to stuff a half-dozen brochures, a pair of shoes, and a dirty gas-station coffee mug into a too-small backpack – all while maintaining some semblance of decorum behind our conference-booth table at the Alaska Forum on the Environment.  I saw her mentally calculating whether anyone could be spared to drive me to the airport, so I quickly explained that there was no problem; I was planning to take the bus.
“There’s a bus to the airport?”  She looked astonished -- and I, as usual, felt slightly deflated by that astonishment.  My depression had nothing to do with my coworker, who is charming – and, moreover, tolerates me with a remarkable degree of equanimity.  It’s just that… well… anyone who has known me for more than four minutes already knows I have a bit of an obsession with bikes -- but now I have to admit that I also have a chip on my shoulder about buses.
More generally, I’ve always been perplexed and frustrated by the gap between what we think we believe and what we actually DO with regard to public transportation in this country.  Those of us who are liberal, progressive, environmental types all say we want it.  Oh, boy!  Buses!  Light rail!  Subway systems!  How efficient! How green!  But when push comes to shove, we hardly ever seem to USE public transportation – especially not buses.   America’s relationship with buses is like Roxanne’s relationship with Cyrano: somewhere between disparaging, patronizing, and oblivious.
Ok, maybe it was reasonable that my coworkers didn’t know anything about Anchorage buses; after all, we live in Fairbanks.  But it’s no better here at home.  Most people in Fairbanks seem unaware that we even have a bus system, and if they know it exists, they don’t know where it goes, or when.   We have a grim problem with air pollution around here, and cars are big contributors.  Moreover, getting a car started – and keeping it running – in temperatures that plummet as low as -50F is neither fun nor cheap.  And yet I know exactly one person who uses the Fairbanks public bus as his primary means of commuting.  One. 
Part of the problem, of course, is a chicken-and-egg thing.  Despite efforts to expand the system, Fairbanks buses have limited schedules and routes.  Trying to take a bus is pretty darn frustrating if it doesn’t go where you want, or arrives only once an hour, or both.  And the bus isn’t too likely to go where you want it to, because we Fairbanksans are horrendously guilty of sprawl.  We spread ourselves across the landscape like syrup oozing across a pancake.  The bus doesn’t reach people’s homes because we’re building our homes way the heck out on Gold Hill, Cripple Creek, Two Rivers, Moose Mountain, and other fancifully named locales.
In other towns and cities – cities with denser populations and less ridiculous climates – the story is of course a bit better.  My sister’s family, in Cambridge/Boston MA, uses the bus and subway system (the T) regularly.  My good friends in Seattle are well acquainted with both light rail and bus routes. But even in those locations, where routes are regular and frequent, most people seem to still be driving most places.  Why?  Well, I’ve heard a lot of reasons.  Convenience (see chicken-and-egg, above).  Speed (Maybe -- but put enough cars on the road, and no one is moving).  Autonomy (I’m biased here, because I kind of hate driving, but on a bus you can relax and read a book!).  And… niceness.
Niceness?  Yeah.  Apparently it’s a biggie.
My coworkers and I had all arrived in Anchorage by plane, and the Downtown Transit Center was diagonally across the street from the conference center where we’d spent the past three days.  It might as well have been in another world.  A poorer world.  A world in which the smell of extraordinarily bad pizza and extraordinarily cheap alcohol hung heavy on the air.  A world in which a terribly young-looking mom with twins in a stroller could not get them to stop crying; a teenage guy was trying to buy a cigarette from a group of strangers; a whole lot of young men were amicably and loudly swearing at each other;  and someone in the corner was talking to himself, quietly. 
Yelp and Foursquare offer online info on the Downtown Transit Center in particular, and the Anchorage People Mover bus system in general.  The comments don’t pull any punches.  “There are a ridiculous amount of drunk and disgusting people here,” says someone named Shauna.  Crystal P. adds, “Try and get a car if at all possible. Buses stink and are slow. Plus there are tons of creepy people down here.”
Creepy people?  Maybe.  Are you a creepy person, Crystal P.? 
Poor people?  Yeah.  Of course.  The bus station is heated, and Anchorage is not tropical.  Plus, there are seats in the station, and friends to hang out with, if you happen to have creepy friends, or drunken friends, or not-at-all-creepy not-at-all-drunken friends, who may or may not be planning to actually ride a bus any time soon.  Our nation is woefully short of places where one can comfortably and freely sit with friends and strangers and enjoy a sense of community, and our nation also has woefully inadequate resources to alleviate poverty.  But that is a subject for another blog post… or ten. 
The idea that people who ride buses are creepy, dangerous, and just plain nasty is not a new one.  When I was in college in the Boston area, I needed to visit my parents on Long Island a few times a year.  I took the bus.  This always surprised people, especially all-the-way-grown-up white-collar people.  But, honey, why don’t you fly?  Or take the train?  While these other options were slightly faster, there weren’t markedly so; the New York area cannot be traversed quickly by any means short of teleportation. But, honey, the train is so much more… comfortable.  So much… nicer. 
Was it?  Well, the aisles were wider, and the bathroom was larger, although not necessarily cleaner.  The train was often, but not always, less crowded.  On the bus, I sometimes ended up sitting next to strangers.  Some of them were marginally annoying.  Some fell asleep.  Some fell asleep on me.  Some were interesting.  I learned about Pakistani culture and the five tenets of Islam from an international gem merchant, and he learned a lot about American culture and feminism from me. 
In any case, the bus was cheaper – way cheaper – than the train, and I was nineteen, and a student.  I was scraping together what income I had by delivering newspapers before class.  In the summer, my employment was wallowing in mud and black flies while moving rocks using only a crowbar and pick.  Seriously.  In any case, as far as I could tell, the biggest difference between the bus and the train was that on the train, the other passengers were almost all white, and middle-class.  On the bus, it was a mixed crowd, with every possible ethnicity and a lot of different flavors of poor.  I took the bus.
Even before college, I’d been on Greyhounds, of course.  In junior high, the special enrichment program that I was lucky enough to be part of involved a lot of extended field trips.  Twenty-five twelve-year-olds drove our teachers batshit crazy all the way from Long Island to Washington D.C., and I’m pretty sure we loved every minute of it.  And in high school, some of my most treasured memories are from the three times in which I managed to qualify for the New York Metropolitan All Stars Mathletes team.  Twenty-nine boys.  Two male teachers.  And me.  On a coach bus headed to Penn State.  It’s a long, long drive.  What did we do?  We played bridge, of course.  The year that the bus’s exhaust system caught fire on the way home and we all had to be evacuated to a rural fire station -- to the confused amusement of the volunteer firefighters -- was just added excitement in an already perfect sojourn.   We were a joke so good that it didn’t even require a punchline: thirty pimply little math geeks escape from a burning bus...
Of course, city buses and Greyhounds were not the first buses I knew.  That honor was reserved for a big, impressive yellow bus with flashing lights.  I can recall LONGING to climb onto that bus -- just as soon as I reached the exalted age of five – so that I could join my big sister in all her glory.   But my remembered excitement runs counter to what seems to be the common middle-class wisdom these days.  Recently, I’ve heard an unsettling number of half-spoken implications to the (vague) effect that schoolbuses are just “not nice”.
The yellow behemoths, circa 1980, were sometimes a trace Lord of the Flies, there’s no denying it.  Drivers who are concentrating on the road are hard pressed to deal with ten-year-olds who have come up with new engineering marvels relating to increasing the velocity of spitballs.  Nonetheless, I have a lot of great schoolbus memories.  Not long after I attained the lofty goal of riding to kindergarten, I achieved the additional self-perceived honor of sitting in the front seat, my legs dangling, giving directions to a substitute bus driver.  I think he was relieved to find that I not only knew the way to Huntington Elementary School but also reliably knew left from right. 
I recall the little boy who had a crush on my sister, and who thought that he might impress her by giving me rocks to add to my rock collection.  Practically every bus ride, I got another rock. I really liked rocks. 
A few years later, when we moved to a new house and I was thus on an unfamiliar bus, being joined in my seat by another fourth-grader who confided that she had just switched into public school from Catholic school, and was thus new, too.  We became fast friends almost immediately.  She patiently taught me to shoot baskets and ride my bike with no hands, and I tutored her in math.  Thirty years later, and she and her wife have twins – just as Jay and I do.
These days, my own twins and I walk up to the school bus stop every morning.  It’s a half-mile jaunt, because we live way the heck down a dirt road in the bottom of a swamp.  We’re not helping Fairbanks’ above-mentioned problem with low-density development by living here.  However, in our defense, we chose this piece of land in part because it’s close enough to town and to our jobs at the university to allow us to be car-free much of the time. 
I don’t mind the fifteen-minute morning hike.  It serves as the start to my morning run-or-bike-commute, and it guarantees that the kids get at least a bit of exercise, even on days when the mercury is below -20F, and recess is cancelled.  It also doubles as time to eat a portable breakfast (usually toast, but sometimes a more ambitious foray into pancakes, fruit, muffins, oatmeal, or yogurt).  We chat about what’s coming up in the day ahead, note the phase of the moon or the configuration of the constellations,  kick snowballs along the icy road,  or say hi to the neighbors’ neurotically excitable dogs.  Sometimes we catch a little aurora, startle a few grouse, or even pause to make way for a moose.  We have our timing down to the minute; when we reach the stop sign on Gold Hill, we can almost always see red safety lights blinking in the dark, a quarter mile down the road, at the next bus stop.  The driver pulls up for my two little people, I kiss the tops of their puffy jacket hoods, and they carefully wait to cross the road.
In the afternoons, we complete the same journey in reverse, but usually with higher energy and more chatter.  Afternoon snacks are clutched in mittened hands – the kids are really stellar at eating with mittens on – and there is more hopping, skipping, slipping, and sliding than mere walking.  Did Coach Davis set up the Indiana Jones obstacle course in gym class?  Do you actually know the meanings of all the words in the Star Spangled Banner?   Did you spell ‘maniac’ correctly? 
A few days ago, during one such session of afternoon conversation, one of the kids remarked (with her mouth full of honey-roasted peanuts) that, “Not very many kids take the bus.” 
I probed.  More than half, I asked?  No, both twins agreed.  Less than half.  Maybe a third, if that. More like a quarter.  Yay, fractions!  Molly and Lizzy weren’t objecting to riding the bus, merely stating a fact: most kids are driven to school.  Which of your friends ride the bus?  Reading between the lines, I began to guess that the economic breakdown among pint-sized bus-riders might not be so different from that among full-sized bus riders.  Buses are not “nice”.
Granted, the twins’ estimates may be off, and granted, some kids walk to school.  But still, there are clearly hundreds of kids being driven to University Park Elementary, every day.  This means a huge, tangled lineup of cars trailing exhaust in the parking lot, which – despite excellent efforts on the part of school administrators – was clearly was not designed for so much traffic. 
So, adults are not riding buses… and neither are kids.  And… I think that’s a shame. 
It’s a shame for the obvious reasons, of course: environmentalism, efficiency, fuel use, road crowding, economy, air quality, and so on.  But (as I’ve bored you all with my circuitous bus-reminiscing) I’ve come to realize that it’s a shame for a host of other reasons, too.  Buses are good places for people-watching, for social mixing, for letting go of road rage, and for doing all the things that people like to do while driving (texting, putting on makeup, eating a four-course-meal) without creating a deadly hazard.  Buses can be slow, but slow isn’t always bad.  Slowness offers the opportunity to read a good book, to learn to spell ‘maniac’, to experience a little parent-free teacher-free subversive conversation, to finish your homework in bumpy-hurried handwriting, to explain everything you know about women’s rights to someone you’ve never met before, to take a nap, or to play bridge with the most heart-stoppingly nerdy boys you have ever met.
I don’t know how to make buses more popular.  I don’t know how to get rich people to ride them.  I don’t know how to argue with the logic of fellow-parents who tell me, quite reasonably, that it’s quicker and simpler and easier to drop off their kids on the way to and from work than to stand at a school bus stop when the mercury is at -40.  I don’t know how to address the fears of parents who think that the schoolbus is somehow dangerous or “not nice”; people tend to dance around the subject rather than face it head-on.  But I do have my suspicions that if kids aren’t riding the school bus when they are seven, they will be less likely – and less willing – to hop on a Greyhound or a city bus when they are twenty-seven, thirty-seven, or forty-seven. 
The bus from downtown Anchorage to the airport cost exactly two dollars.  My bills were a bit rumpled, but the driver helped me get them into the slot.  The ride was relaxing: perhaps ten percent slower than a taxi would have been, because of the stops, but at least 90% cheaper, and no less comfortable.  I enjoyed it.  And I’d do it again, every time – unless, of course, the option of riding a bike were available.