A collection of essays, outdoor adventure stories, ruminations, wordplay, parental angst, and blatant omphaloskepsis, generated in all seasons and for many reasons at 64.8 degrees north latitude

Wednesday, July 26, 2023

Parlez you Deutch?

 


“Ist… Toiletten?” 

The guy addressing me looked a little overwhelmed amidst the hubbub of the Freiburg im Brisgau train station.  He was wide-eyed, dark-haired, brown-skinned, and barely out of his teens.  He also, it seemed, needed a bathroom.

“Ja!” I nodded encouragingly.  “Ist Toiletten!  Um… Ist ein Euro…”  I pointed to where a coin had to be inserted in order to enter.  Ugh.  Pay toilets.  But still, toilets. 

Apparently this young man had the necessary euro, which was a good thing, because I was pretty sure I’d used the last of my own coins on the way into the bathroom a few minutes earlier.  He smiled.  “Danke.”

“Bitte”.  I smiled back, watched him successfully gain access, and moved on.

He didn’t speak German.  Then again, neither do I. 

My friend Amy and I planned our European vacation with just enough attention to detail to be sure that we didn’t end up stranded in airports, dark alleys, or idyllic-yet-bemusing mazes of hundreds of tiny vegetable gardens.  But we left much of the trip up for grabs, including the question of precisely which towns we’d immerse ourselves in.  Or which countries.  And, by extension, which languages.

I detest the arrogance of Americans who expect the entire globe to speak English to them.  Sadly, however, I am no more linguistically equipped than many such travelers.  This means that if I want to see anything of the world, I need to be willing to look like an idiot. 

Amy and I agreed to meet up in Karlsruhe, a mid-size college town in western Germany where she was wrapping up a short teaching gig.  The Black Forest area and the nearby Alsace-Lorraine region of France were part of our vaguely-planned travel agenda.  Switzerland was more of a whim. But, as entire nations with hundreds of years of complex history go, it was an excellent whim.

Amy speaks passable but imperfect German, plus a little French remembered from the distant past of high school.  I speak terrible but enthusiastic French, gleaned from the same high school classed plus two years of not-very-dedicated practice with the cheery Duolingo owl.  I also speak approximately thirty-seven words of any other given European language, learned via guesswork, Latin roots, and osmosis.

Obviously, we were all set for international adventure.

I flew direct from home – Fairbanks, Alaska -- to Frankfurt.  This trajectory offers incredible luxury in over-the-Artic surrealism, allowing a traveler to acquire ten hours of jetlag over the course of a nine-hour flight.  Despite my language inadequacy, the train connection was easy.  Of course it was.  Because Europe. 

Our first full day was spent exploring Karlsruhe.  Ergo, talking was up to Amy.  From the start, she and I were unofficially playing a game that I’ll call “Anything But English”.  The goal was to conduct conversations without our interlocutors figuratively or literally rolling their eyes and switching to our native tongue.  This game was stacked; while Amy’s German is much better than my French, Germans are much more likely to know English than are their French neighbors.

As such, my verb-mangling and noun-forgetting found plenty of scope on the next stage of our journey, in the ridiculously scenic and historic small city of Strasbourg, France.  More than once, I was reminded of David Sedaris’s snortingly funny self-deprecation in Me Talk Pretty One Day: “On my fifth trip to France… things began to come together, and I went from speaking like an evil baby to speaking like a hillbilly. "Is thems the thoughts of cows?  I want me some lamb chop with handles on 'em.”

I had different but equally bungling food-related questions. “C’est un legume? Pas de viande?  Je suis une vegetarienne.”  The server at the outdoor café – all the cafes were outdoor cafes, idyllic in the cobbled streets, shaded by umbrellas or spreading maples – was a time-worn and kindly chain-smoker.  She assured me that “le poireau” was indeed a vegetable, but that still left a lot of wiggle-room with regard to what kind of tart I was ordering.  I dredged my brain.  I knew the words for peas, onions, carrots, mushrooms, tomatoes, beans, cabbage, lettuce, cucumbers...  Okay, so it wouldn’t be a lettuce and cucumber tart… wait… “C’est un legume comme un oignon vert, mais tres grand?”

The server grinned.  “Oui, oui!”

“Leek!” I said, with a far greater sense of triumph than leek-identifying could reasonably warrant.  “It’s leek tart!” 

“Leek,” our server repeated, earnestly hoping to help the next clueless American or Brit to come along.  Who says the French are unaccommodating?  She wandered off to place the order.  A few minutes later, she returned to tell us that, malheureusement, there was no leek tart today.  Quel dommage.  Mais la tarte a l’oignon est vraiment très délicieuse. 

We ate onion tart.  The sun shone down on the cobblestones.  Our server cheerfully smoked another cigarette while ambling off to get us the bill. 

In some ways, Amy and I traveled exactly like the middle-aged people we are.  Clubbing and nightlife were nowhere on the agenda; we were more interested in cathedrals, museums, architecture, parks, forests, and gardens.  On the other hand, we toted backpacks, draped sink-washed laundry around our modest shared hotel rooms, and walked 12-16 miles per day, just… seeing stuff.  We ate fruit by the pound from market stalls, and consumed fresh-baked croissants, pretzels, and baguettes with glutenous and gluttonous abandon.  We climbed all the steps, turrets, hills, and belltowers.  All the belltowers!  And we made linguistic fools of ourselves.

At our Strasbourg hotel, the desk clerk, a tall, slender young Black man, grinned at my French and asked where I learned it.  In high school, I told him -- which was a long, long, LONG time ago – and from the little green Duolingo owl on my phone.  He laughed.  Did I speak English? he inquired.  When I complimented him on his command of my own language, he told me that he’d learned it from his dad, who was from Ghana.  His self-deprecating tone suggested that his bilingualism was easy, almost a form of cheating. 

Thousands of new citizens are enriching the linguistic complexity of Europe.  All three of the nations that Amy and I visited have thriving populations of immigrants, as well as kids growing up as first-generation natives. Many of the new residents are refugees.  France has welcomed half a million in recent years, mostly from Afghanistan, Syria, and Sri Lanka.  Germany is now home to almost one and a half million diverse new residents, a fact that feels keenly poignant on so many different levels.  In the streets, I heard mashups of… well, okay, I’m not entirely sure.  French and Pashto?  German and Arabic? It’s a gleeful, colorful, complicated, wonderful Babel out there, and we threw ourselves into it.

Wandering the pedestrian plazas of Strasbourg one evening, Amy and I found our dinnertime palates tempted not by haute cuisine, but by a cheerful hole-in-the wall Syrian place.  “I feel like we should eat French food while we’re in France,” I said, then paused.  This food WAS French food, being eaten by newly French people. 

The felafel was excellent.

Later in the trip, a young man who looked perhaps of Syrian origin politely approached me as I was returning a rental bike to a rack.  He wanted to know if he could check out the same bike after I’d checked it in, because it clearly worked well and was the right size.  He started the conversation in German.  We were in a border town, so I tried French.  He responded in kind.  It wasn’t until we were pleasantly parting that it became clear that he also spoke perfectly serviceable English.

This three-flavor blended language became even more prevalent in Switzerland, which is not just a border town but a border nation. Basel, Switzerland was easy to reach (trains!)  The Rhine was azure in the summer heat, and I envied the locals bobbing sociably down the river, their clothes and valuables floating with them in little dry-bags.  These folks were clearly planning to hop out refreshed and take public transport home (trams!).  Basel also had the coolest cathedral of all, boasting two bell towers AND a dim and delightfully creepy crypt.  And everyone in Basel seemed to speak at least three languages – not necessarily one at a time. 

My mother spent a year in Switzerland as a young adult, honing her high school French into fluency while typing letters for an international corporation.  Years later, trotting out her rusty language skills, she laughingly remarked that her French was better after a glass of wine.  She had a point.  As Sedaris demonstrates, multilingualism requires a level of letting go. In Basel, I felt like there was no way to do language “wrong”.  It was here that I gave up any last pretenses of knowing anything about verb tenses or noun genders, and just jumped into the full-on linguistic bedlam.

I thought that communication would revert to being Amy’s job when we left France, but Basel wasn’t the only place that felt like a free-for-all.  Late one afternoon, on another scorching-yet-wonderful day of exploring, I heard, “Excuse me?”  An anxious-looking girl of about 12 or 13 was addressing me in English… with a thick French accent… in Germany. 

It took me a moment to parse this.  But the surrounding gaggle of notebook-toting middle-schoolers offered an instant flash-back to mid-eighties school field trips with Amy and 23 other tragically awkward children.  We often visited neighboring states, such as the wilds of New Jersey, where we had to record important facts about historic monuments or pause to “notice the terrain”.  These poor kids were clearly on a field trip to a neighboring nation.

I jumped in and started trying to help them in my awful French. This resulted in several fits of uncontrollable giggling from the hangers-on, but a look of relief from the poor girl who had somehow been forced by her peers into the position of interlingual spokesperson.  She answered me in a rush of French. 

I did my best.  La rue à droite, puis tournez à gauche, c'est tout près. I’m pretty sure they would have found the cathedral without my help.  It’s très grande. But there was satisfaction in communication – even though I couldn’t explain, in French, the connection and nostalgia I felt.

I wasn’t sure I would have been able to explain it in English.  Nonetheless, throughout the trip, my lack of ability to explain myself didn’t stop me from doing things that might require explanation – such as stopping in the middle of a German city park and sticking my head in the lake. 

In my defense, there was a clear precedent.  A brisk, fit, 70ish guy in a bathing suit and towel had just emerged from an early-morning dip.  It was about 6:30 a.m., but the temperature was already about 70 (or 21, for reasonable metric Europeans).  A combination of jet-lag, enthusiasm, and scorching weather had rendered me a Very Early Morning Jogger.

When I popped up, my hair refreshingly soaked, a woman appeared at my side.  She looked like a solid citizen: about my age, earnest, tidy.  “Guten Morgen,” I smiled.  She answered.  And didn’t stop answering.

This woman seemed to be a chatty-yet-solemn extrovert with time on her hands and a lot to say.  It involved water.  And chlorine.  And. . . I don’t know, something complicated about cancer, a tragedy, children, medical care?  Things were better now?  It was worthy of lots of head-nodding and hmm-hmming.  It was way too late for me to try to explain that I do not, in fact speak German.  At all.  Instead, I kept a straight face and nodded seriously at the serious lady who was telling me serious things.  I learned a lot from her – albeit not, perhaps, precisely the things she was trying to tell me. 

I learned that listening, even without comprehension, can still be valuable.  I was reminded that body language accounts for a staggeringly high percentage of communication.  And I pondered the deep, complex, overwhelmingly hard-wired linguistic instincts that have driven humans to invent and propagate languages. Everywhere.  Every era.  Pidgins, creoles, dialects, sign languages, and all the insanity of verb tenses – we’ve done this instinctively, collectively, literally thousands of times.  Language is not merely a characteristic of humans, it’s part of the fundamental definition and blueprint of our species.  We’re tool-using apes, true, but even more obviously, we’re apes who communicate – socially, informationally, educationally, connectively, crucially, constantly.  Even while dripping next to a lake.

Eventually, I used polite gestures to suggest that, gosh, maybe I’d better be continuing my morning run.  I smiled.  I turned.  “Danke schon!” I said, as I jogged away. 

I meant every word.

The trip ended before I wanted it to, as all trips should. On my flight home – a surreal nine solid hours of it being consistently 2:10 in the afternoon – the Condor flight attendant spoke to me in German, and I carefully replied with my miniscule vocabulary: danke, bitte, wasser, CocaCola.  She was undoubtedly laughing at me behind her polite smile.  Her English was impeccable, and she was, somewhat inexplicably, using that language to communicate with the fellow Fairbanksan who happened to be seated next to me.  But I wasn’t ready to return to the humdrum of “yes please” and “no thanks” until I was through Customs and Immigration.

Looking back on the trip now, I think that although I clocked a few victories in almost actually speaking French, my favorite foreign-language conversation was the one that took place in elemental Deutch.

“Is toilets?” 

“Yes, is toilets!”

I don’t speak any German.  Neither did the young stranger in the Freiburg im Brisgau train station.  We’re both human, though.  Sometimes that’s what matters most.


Sunday, May 14, 2023

Gegiedes

 


GEGIEDES

A ten-minute play

by Nancy Fresco

 

 

Characters

Dr. Rachel Marbank, English professor and Shakespeare scholar (female, 30s-50s)

Emily Youngblood, Master’s student in English Literature (female, early 20s)

Gegiedes (male, 30-50s – approximately the same age as Rachel)

 

Setting

A faculty office in a college somewhere in the US, present day

 

Notes

The set can be minimal, with a desk or small table, office chair, and additional chair suggesting the office space.

Costuming is basic: slightly frumpy for Rachel and unobtrusive for Emily.  Gegiedes should wear a tunic or toga in the style of ancient Greece, preferably with sandals. 

Characters can be of any race or physical ability, and genders and names can be changed at the discretion of the director. 


 

[LIGHTS UP. RACHEL is sitting at her desk, stage right, reading and marking a stack of paperwork as if grading papers.  She looks tired and over-worked. GEGIEDES enters unseen by RACHEL, stage left. She does not hear him as he speaks.]

GEGIEDES
Two academics, both alike in dignity,
In ivory tower, where we lay our scene,
From ancient tryst find new-fledged amity,
Where civil rules kept civil minds too clean.
From forth the dusty tomes of academe
A pair of star-eyed lovers reappears
Whose new adventures soon will make it seem
The joy of youth’s untrammeled by the years
The sweat-marked passage of these scholars’ love,
Although they may be of your parents' age,
Will, thanks to tenure, soon have naught to prove.
‘Twill be but ten minutes traffic on our stage;
The which if you with patient ears attend,
What here shall miss, our toil shall strive to mend.

 

[GEGIEDES exits stage left as we hear the sound of someone knocking at the door stage right.]

RACHEL
[Looking up and sighing at the interruption] Come in.

[EMILY enters, tentatively.  She is carrying a folder full of papers.  RACHEL smiles and gestures her toward a chair.]

Good morning, Emily – it’s Emily, right? [EMILY nods] You said you wanted to discuss a potential Master’s thesis topic with me?  I should warn you that I really can’t take on much right now, in terms of advising duties.

EMILY
Yes, I – well, thank you so much for taking the time, Dr. Marbank. I’ll be brief. I know that your work includes an examination of the social context of the humor in Shakespeare’s plays… so I thought…[trails off uncertainly]

RACHEL
[With a slight laugh] Oh, that goes back a good few years – but yes, I did co-author a couple of papers with Nick when we were… [Pause, as if in happy nostalgic memory] … that is, when I was a student.

EMILY
Yes, “The Role of the Clown: Iconoclastic Boundary-Crossing in Shakespearean Histories” -- with [looks at the top paper in her folder] Nikolas Papadopoulos.  But he’s not here anymore...

RACHEL
Ah.  No, Nick left long ago. We… lost touch.  He was… a foreign exchange student… brilliant, quirky, so creative, always laughing… we were so very young... [Pause, clears throat]  There was also “The Comic Muse as—”

EMILY
[Eagerly interrupting]  “— as the Voice of the Commoner in Shakespeare’s Works.”  Yes.  I’ve read that, too.

RACHEL
[Pleased] Well, it’s nice to know that another generation is appreciating the Bard. 

EMILY
Yes!  I’m particularly interested in how his works were understood and interpreted by people in the Globe Theatre.  The original audiences.  And, um, how that’s different from now. 

RACHEL
[Patiently] Which aspect of that difference?

EMILY
Like, specifically, we take the plays more seriously nowadays, because we don’t include Gegiedes [pronounced guh GUY uh deez].

RACHEL
Wait… who?

[Gegiedes enters stage left, unseen by RACHEL and EMILY.  He carries a lightweight chair.  He strolls to a spot about 15 feet from them, slightly upstage, and seats himself in a posture imitating that of RACHEL.  As she speaks and moves, he exaggeratedly mimics her mannerisms and motions.]

EMILY
Gegiedes. 

RACHEL
[Perplexed] Nick and I never…. That is, I’ve read Shakespeare’s complete works more than once, and I don’t recall and character by the name of…

EMILY
Gegiedes.  Well… yeah, he’s not in the Complete Works.

RACHEL
I’ve also read lesser known quartos.  Contested versions.  I’m afraid I still don’t...

EMILY
Yeah.  Um.  He’s not in those.  [Pause. RACHEL checks her watch, and EMILY shifts uncomfortably.]  But I’ve found references to him in primary sources! [Fumbles in her folder, pulls out a paper]. See, here, from Abraham Wright’s Notebook, he called Hamlet [reads] “An indifferent play, but for the wit of Gegiedes.”

RACHEL
[Obviously startled] That’s not what I remember from Wright. [Takes paper from EMILY, peers at it.]  But who – who is this Gegiedes?”

EMILY
Well… Wright didn’t say.  Just that he was funny and smart, I guess?  But I was curious, so I started looking.  And… see, here.  [Pulls out another paper]. Gabriel Harvey scribbled in a margin of one of his books, [reads] “The younger sort take much delight in Shakespeare’s Venus and Adonis; but his Lucrece and his tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, have it in them to please the wiser sort”. 

RACHEL
Oh, yes, I remember how amused Nick was by Harvey’s –

EMILY
[Interrupting] Then under that, he wrote, “Gegiedes”. 

RACHEL
What?

EMILY
And underlined it.  Twice.

RACHEL
[Thoroughly engaged now, pushing aside her previous stack of papers and taking another paper from EMILY.]  How did I never notice… But this one [waving a paper], this is one of Simon Forman’s well-known accounts.  And I don’t see…

EMILY
[Leaning over the document and pointing] There, see that?

RACHEL
I don’t… Oh!  It’s… a gamma?  A Greek gamma!  I… don’t speak much Greek.  I learned a little, from Nick.  I wish I’d learned more.

EMILY
Gamma.  Like, an initial. 

RACHEL
Gamma for Gegiedes. 

EMILY
Yeah.  And, see, it’s all over his notes, if you look. But sometimes it’s uppercase and sometimes lowercase, and either one could pass for just an extra squiggle, you know?  Because… Greek letters?  And the spelling was weird – I mean, non-standard -- back then, anyhow.

RACHEL
[Eagerly rifling through pages] Yes, I see!

[RACHEL and EMILY lean together over EMILY’s papers, immersed in reading.  GEGIEDES stands and strolls a few steps forward, still unseen by them.]

GEGIEDES
Once old desire did in its death-bed lie,
And new affection gaped to be its heir;
That fleeting “fair” that caught a wand’ring eye
With Rachel matched again -- seems now not fair.
So once beguiled, returning, loves again,
Bewitched now not by shallow charms and looks,
But to his love drawn nigh by wit and brain
To steal love's sweets amid a stack of books.
Being thought unreal, he lacks clear schemes
To breathe such vows as lovers use to swear;
And she perhaps still loves, yet has no dreams
To meet her once-beloved anywhere:
But passion lends them power, time, means, to meet
Thus tempering reality with heat.

[Gegiedes strolls back to his seat. He watches Rachel with great interest, no longer mocking her movements, but listening intently and reacting –nodding, smiling, seeming to cheer her on.]

EMILY
So… I wondered if maybe Gegiedes was an unnamed clown?  And you wrote about the clowns…

RACHEL
Almost all the Bard’s plays have some kind of fool, of course, but he’s usually named – Dogberry, Costard...  All the characters Nick and I loved so much…

EMILY
But none of them are named Gegiedes.

RACHEL
He’s just “clown” in Othello, though.  Oh, and in Titus Andronicus, too.  Ugh, humor doesn’t work well in that one.  And he’s just “Fool” in King Lear.

EMILY
What about the character called Chorus?

RACHEL
Hmm… that’s an idea.  That was a concept borrowed from the Greek tradition… although the chorus wasn’t comic.  Shakespeare used a chorus in five of his plays: Romeo and Juliet, Troilus and Cressida, Pericles, and Henry IV, parts 1 and 2.

EMILY
I always felt like that Chorus character was weird in Romeo and Juliet.  I mean, when I first saw it, when I was a kid.  Like, who is he?  And where does he go for the whole play?  He gives a summary of the story at the beginning, then he shows up for one more sonnet and then…

RACHEL
Yes, and then buggers off and never reappears again. Gone. Chorus abandonment. No Greek closure.  Very unsatisfying… 

[Gegiedes looks guilty and stricken.  He sinks his head into his hands, as if berating himself.]

…but then, Romeo and Juliet is hugely overrated as a romance, in my opinion.

EMILY
That’s what I’ve always thought!  But it seemed kind of unsophisticated to admit that I like the comedies better…

RACHEL
Maybe sophistication is overrated.  [She smiles] Nick and I had a hell of a lot of fun, exploring the comedies.

                                                                                      [Gegiedes perks up and looks hopeful.]

RACHEL
The name Gegiedes… I wonder… [She pulls out her phone and taps the screen as she talks].  I really don’t remember much of the Greek Nick taught me, but Google Translate… Huh.  [She pauses, taps the screen, looks surprised, taps the screen again.]  Well, depending on the spelling and accents or lack thereof, it seems like Gegiedes means “sir” or “priest”.  Or possibly “old man…”

                                                                                      [Gegiedes looks mock-offended]

Or even “old woman” or “grandmother”

[Gegiedes shrugs and throws up his hands, as if saying sure, whatever.]

… but, no, that accent would change the pronunciation.  So… maybe “sir” is closest.  Just… some guy.  Maybe it’s more a generic title than a name.  A placeholder.

EMILY
So… Gegiedes could be the clown, the chorus, the priest… just some kind of narrator person?  But… why is he never listed directly, or named in any of the scripts?

RACHEL
[Pondering as she talks] Well… maybe Gegiedes was a running joke between Shakespeare, his Players, and the audiences in the Globe?  Maybe he was understood to be whichever character spoke directly to the audience, and wasn’t afraid to mock the other characters, the narrative, the playwright himself…

EMILY
A hilariously snarky commentator?

RACHEL
Reminding everyone not to take life too seriously all the time.  [Smiling] Nick was so good at that.

EMILY
Right!  In your paper – the one about being iconoclastic – you and Nick, I mean Professor Papadopoulos…

RACHEL
I have no idea whether he ever became a professor.

[Gegiedes straightens up proudly, mimes putting a mortarboard on his head.]

EMILY
The two of you wrote about how the clown’s role is to tell subversive truths.  To speak truth to power. 

RACHEL
This is why Shakespeare is timeless.

EMILY
To laugh at all the rich pompous idiots who think they’re right because everyone else is too afraid to say they’re not.

RACHEL
See?  Timeless.  It’s like Shakespeare knew about the tenure review process.

EMILY
[Laughing] To mock tradition-for-the-sake-of-tradition?

RACHEL
And formality that undermines humanity, and ego that wrecks spontaneity, and middle-aged staidness that forgets the joyous frivolity of youth. All of that, in a sexy Greek toga.

EMILY
[Laughing harder] Shakespeare thought togas were sexy?

RACHEL
Who knows?  Hell, why not?  Shakespeare made sexual jokes out of everything – swords, cups, you name it.  But maybe… well, as far as we can tell, Shakespeare wasn’t fully in control of Gegiedes.  He wasn’t named.  He wasn’t written in.  And… maybe that was the point.

EMILY
What do you mean?

RACHEL
Well… all these audience members who loved Gegiedes [she gestures to EMILY’s folder of papers] …maybe they weren’t all seeing the same Gegiedes.  Or, not seeing him in quite the same way.

EMILY
Like… he was ad-libbing?

RACHEL
The funniest people tend to do that a lot.

EMILY
One of the Players? 

RACHEL
Sure.  Or several of them.  Or all of them.  Who doesn’t have an inner Gegiedes, just waiting to come out?

EMILY
We all have an inner snarky voice?

RACHEL
Providing cogent, witty, iconoclastic commentary on everything that is ridiculous in life, and everything that is charming, and everything that we are afraid to say, and afraid to see, and afraid to admit. 

EMILY
And our inner voice is personified by a Greek dude wandering around in a toga?

RACHEL
Indubitably. [Laughs]  No, really, I guess the point might be that our inner voice could be anyone – like that vague translation of “Gegiedes”.  The sage, the elder, the holy man, the fool.  It can be personified in a character, or ad-libbed by an actor who wants to goad and tweak the playwright when he’s taking himself too seriously.  Maybe even an audience member can be Gegiedes.

EMILY
Shakespeare, Rocky Horror style?

RACHEL
People yelled and threw vegetables.  So, sure, it’s possible they also jumped up and joined the show.  But… maybe once audiences have accepted all those permutations of Gegiedes, then he’s always there, even when he’s not.  The eternal and ever-present Gegiedes.

EMILY
Like, just in people’s heads?

RACHEL
Say you’re watching Romeo and Juliet.  It’s the party scene near the beginning.  What is Gegiedes saying?

EMILY
“Wow, Romeo, you little twit, you absolutely don’t know the difference between love and hormones.”

RACHEL
Exactly!  And what does Gegiedes have to say to Lord and Lady Capulet?

EMILY
“Okay, so you obviously ducked out of all responsibility and let your kid be raised by this kind-hearted but slightly crazy nurse.  That might work out okay if you weren’t also obsessive egotists wrapped up in politics and petty feuds.”

RACHEL
Ha, great.  And what would you say to the Friar, later on?

EMILY
“Really, you think this is a good idea?  Marrying these kids?  Has celibacy addled you? This whole scenario isn’t a romance, it’s a treatise on bad parenting.”

RACHEL
[Impressed] Wow, you have quite the inner Gegiedes. 

EMILY
[Modest] Well, I got a lot of that from the papers that you and Dr. Papadopoulos wrote.

RACHEL
As I said, I have no idea whether Nick’s a…

EMILY
[Interrupting]  About that… I maybe haven’t been totally honest about all this.

[There is a pause.  Emily is gathering her thoughts.  Rachel looks at her in confusion.  Meanwhile, Gegiedes jumps up, grabbing his chair, and hurries offstage.]

EMILY
I mean, all the part about hoping to work with you as an advisor for my Master’s thesis, that’s all true.  I was desperately digging around for a topic, reading all the publications from all the faculty members in the English department, and I loved those papers you wrote.  I emailed you right away, last month, but I didn’t hear back…

RACHEL
Ugh, so sorry.  Email gets away from me…

EMILY
Oh, it’s okay.  I kept going anyhow, taking a deep dive into original sources, like I said.  And I found Gegiedes, and was really excited.  I hadn’t heard from you, and was going to email again, but then I saw that your co-author had a Greek name, and I thought, well, Greek, gamma, Gegiedes – maybe he’d be interested?  Maybe he’d know something?  Maybe I could try emailing him.  So I did.

RACHEL
Nick?!  But… how?

EMILY
[Shrugging]  Google?

RACHEL
But Papadopoulos is literally the most common name in Greece…

EMILY
I just assumed he’d be Dr. Papadopoulos, and that he’d still be working on Shakespearean stuff in some way.  It… wasn’t hard.

RACHEL
[Chagrinned] No.  No, I guess it wouldn’t have been hard.

EMILY
Anyhow, he wrote back right away.  He was really excited about Gegiedes, and had a lot of the same ideas as the ones you just came up with.  He… asked a lot about you, too.  I didn’t have much to tell him, of course.

RACHEL
Of course.  [Pause] But, you have his email address… I wonder if…

                                                                                      [There is a knock at the office door.]

RACHEL
[Perplexed and slightly irritated to be interrupted] Yes? Come in?

[Gegiedes enters.  He is now dressed in ordinary casual clothes, e.g. jeans and a T-shirt, but he is still wearing his classic Greek sandals.  He pauses, uncertain and hesitant.  He and Rachel look at one another for a long beat.]

RACHEL
Nick?!

EMILY
[Performing introductions with mock formality] Dr. Marbank, Dr. Papadopoulos.  Dr. Papadopoulos, Dr. Marbank.

RACHEL
Nick.

[RACHEL slowly rises from her chair.  She and GEGIEDES continue to gaze at one another.  He moves forward toward her slowly, still uncertain, and stops about a dozen feet away.]

GEGIEDES
“If we shadows have offended…”

RACHEL
[Laughing, joyful] “…say but this, and all is mended!”

[RACHEL and GEGIEDES run to one another and embrace warmly.  Then then fall back to arms’ length, holding both of each others’ hands.  They slowly spin one another, laughing. They each let go of one hand, keeping the others clasped, and start toward the exit together, holding hands, heads close, whispering and laughing together.]

RACHEL
[Over her shoulder, to Emily] Have you considered expanding your thesis ideas into a PhD?  I think you’ve got a lot of great material.

[Still murmuring and laughing, RACHEL and GEGIEDES exit.  Emily moves from her chair to the seat at the desk previously occupied by Rachel.  She puts her feet up on the desk, leaning back comfortably, stretching.  Smiling, she picks up her folder of materials and gets to work.]