“Whoops… sorry! ”
I backed away from a near-tragic collision with my
coworker’s bowl of minestrone, and in the process almost did a backflip over
the coffee-grounds-composting bucket.
The office kitchen is woefully small for the 30 or more people who use
it on a daily basis, but in this case, that was only part of the problem. The other part was me.
Although no one had ended up wearing hot tomato-y goodness,
I felt like an explanation was in order – or maybe more of an excuse. “Sorry -- I’m blind on that side,” I said
with a smile.
“Oh! Um…” Now the poor hapless minestrone-eater looked
embarrassed. “Um… oh. I’m… um… sorry.”
Gosh, there’s nothing like a birth defect to inject
awkwardness into friendly lunchtime banter!
Never mind that mine is a trivially minor birth defect that doesn’t
hamper my existence in any way, other than rendering me worthless at softball
and tragically unable to enjoy 3-D movies.
I don’t mourn my inability to solve Magic Eye puzzles, and I’ve long
since accepted the fact that my large nose further eclipses my already sub-par
field of view. But in our society,
discussion of imperfections is just… awkward.
As a parent, I’ve run across a few articles and blog posts
that attempt to address the question of How To Talk About Differences. One of the prime directives seems to be that
they have to be called Differences, never handicaps, or problems, or
disabilities, or “Hey, what’s the deal with your eye?” As a corollary to this rule, we should never
in any way suggest that it’s better
two have two eyes than only one. Cyclops
rules!
I get the point, of course.
We don’t want our kids to stigmatize or bully other children, or try to
pull rank on someone else by virtue of having cooler braces, a cast with more
signatures, or a different number of limbs.
Since my own issue is so terribly minor, I don’t feel like I have any
jurisdiction in this realm. I don’t have
any idea what it’s like to be genuinely-both-eyes-blind or to have a child with
Down Syndrome, so I should probably just shut up. Usually, I do. To my soup-eating coworker, I merely said
something cheery and bland, like “Oh, no biggie!” I know the rules: Don’t Talk About It. But as I popped day-old casserole into the
microwave, my rebellious side goaded me into thinking that maybe our society is
being so cautious that we’re actually being disingenuous to ourselves – or, at
the very least, confusing to our kids.
When I was in elementary school, it was easy to explain what
the deal was with my eye, because other kids asked. They asked with interest, and they listened
with equal interest to my responses. My right eye doesn’t look like the left
one; it’s smaller, darker brown, has a milky white pupil, and tends to wander
when I’m tired, unfocused, or bored. (Of
course, if you observe its meanderings you should not assume that YOU are
making me tired, unfocused or bored, unless you are leading some kind of
meeting that has lasted longer than the capacity of everyone’s attention span
and/or bladder.) To be more specific, I
have a congenital cataract; I was born with the lens of one eye clouded to the
point of almost complete opacity. Given
that the surgical options at the time were rudimentary and risky, my parents
made the decision to leave well enough alone.
This choice was irreversible, since by the time I was two, my left eye
hogged up all the available neural connections.
I’d like to think this makes my left eye some kind of uber-eye that can
see through walls and around corners, but my kids are doubtless glad that I
have no such mega-Mommy-powers. My
long-ago peers wanted to know if what I saw out of my right eye was the same as
what they saw if they closed their own: darkness. No, I said.
What I saw out of my right eye was the same as what they saw out of
their ears. (Kids love this answer,
trust me.) Inevitably, the conversation
led to my playmates making hilarious (read “inappropriate”) gestures just
outside my field of view, to test whether I’d catch them at it. It was funny.
Actually, it still kinda is.
But then everyone stopped asking.
The only other era of my life when people openly wondered
what the heck was wrong with my eye was when I lived in a different
culture. In Jamaica,
the social rules regarding personal comments are for the most part a lot…
looser than they are in the US. By the time I’d been there for a few months,
I’d gotten used to being called “Whitey” by anyone who didn’t know my
name. I’d also made enough friends that
I could engage in a conversation about why this would never, ever fly in my
home country. It wasn’t polite, at home,
I explained, for a bus driver to say something like, “Hey, you, fat woman in
the back!” or “One-legged guy, you take this seat!” My new friends found such
rules amusing. Doesn’t the fat lady know
she’s fat? Hasn’t the man with one leg,
you know, noticed that the other one
is missing? Isn’t it pretty ridiculous,
and actually kind of offensive, to pretend that such things are invisible?
Here in the U.S.
we impose a deep, silent taboo around “differences.” At the same time, we foster intense
cognitive dissonance by trying to persuade our children that differences are
something super-fabulous, even when it’s obvious to even the youngest child
that some of them just… aren’t. How is a
first-grader supposed to parse these mixed messages?
I’m not sure if I have a useful solution, but maybe we could
begin by being a bit clearer in explaining what kind of “difference” can be viewed as wholly positive, in the sense that differences
render the polyglot of humanity that much richer and more complex. I’ve talked to the kids about how we wouldn’t
want everyone to be English-speaking, or white-skinned, or brown-haired, or
five-foot-eight, or female – even if I’m perfectly happy to live with those
characteristics myself. It would be
boring! Difference is fun! It’s ok to be the only kid in your class who
loves zucchini! I want my six-year-olds
to wholly embrace the fabulousness of variety.
I want them to aspire to be
different (especially when they reach the evilly homogenizing world of middle
school when Conform Or Suffer often seems to be the social mantra). Being a liberal-minded sort, I could happily
espouse the variety engendered by classmates who wear nose rings or Islamic
crescents or tutus or kilts or gay pride stickers. But I don’t want my kids – or anyone else’s
-- to differentiate themselves via monocularity... or worse. Wanting to be different seems like a peculiar
aspiration when “different” includes the profound autism of an unspeaking child
on the playground, or their grandpa’s Parkinson’s Disease.
Don’t get me wrong, I certainly want society to fully
embrace everyone, and to celebrate whatever abilities and fantastic individual
qualities that person may have. But to
six-year-olds, it seems confusing if Mommy uses the same language to talk about
hair color, muteness, and wheelchairs. I
agree that it’s important that the kids know that the PERSON isn’t bad. The person is wonderful. The person has feelings, and commonalities,
and great qualities such as a willingness to (wordlessly) spin the
merry-go-round, or the patience to play (while seated) multiple rounds of
Connect Four. But the condition? I’m not going to tell my children that autism
is a fun form of human variability. I
refuse to say that Parkinson’s Disease is just a “difference” that adds to the
exciting diversity of their world. These
are illnesses. I want them cured. Preferably now, this minute. I also
want everyone to become just a trace less anxious about talking about the “differences”
that are less-than-desirable. To
children, anything that is hush-hush is likely to seem more scary and taboo,
not less – and therefore more negative, and more stigmatized. I also suspect – although again, I can’t be
sure on this point – that our intense trepidation about imperfections can
sometimes make it harder for the individual in question, not easier.
For me, of course, taboos about handicaps don’t make much
difference, even if I do sometimes seem to be more bumbling than the average absent-minded
professor. When I think about my
cataract at all, I feel lucky that I got off so lightly. Congenital cataracts are often associated
with other defects… such as mental retardation. Wait and see, my stressed-out parents were told, back in ’72. Won’t that be fun? There’s no telling how “different” your child
may be! Sometimes my family tells me that the jury’s still out.
Ultimately, for all that I love diversity, I’m a pragmatist. Given the chance, I would happily accept a
functioning second eye. At the same
time, I am profoundly glad that I can see, and hear, and express myself
(somewhat) coherently. Yeah, call me
crazy. Or, if you prefer, call me
“different.” Then try making really rude
gestures while standing to my right, and give yourself away by giggling. Just keep in mind that if I accidentally
sidestep into your minestrone, I’ll have a really good excuse.
Thanks, Nancy! This is great. I am becoming somewhat one-eyed myself.... alaskamamaruns.blogspot.com
ReplyDelete